Editorial and Corrections Policy

BlockMind publishes educational research about crypto markets, investment-research workflows, portfolio monitoring, token risk, and AI tools. This page explains how that work is produced and where its limits are.

Who writes the content

Articles attributed to the BlockMind Research Team are organization-authored. The byline means the article was prepared for BlockMind and checked against this policy. It does not imply that a named financial adviser, auditor, lawyer, tax professional, or security researcher reviewed it.

We will use a named author or reviewer only when that person has agreed to be identified and their relevant role can be stated accurately. We do not invent expert biographies, credentials, quotes, customers, tests, or performance results.

Our evidence standard

For claims that readers can verify, we prefer sources in this order:

1. Protocol documentation, contracts, governance proposals, audits, filings, and raw data.
2. Official product documentation and pricing pages.
3. Peer-reviewed research and recognized standards.
4. Reputable reporting with transparent sourcing.
5. Secondary explainers only when a primary source is unavailable or the secondary analysis is itself relevant.

A link should support the nearby claim, not merely discuss the same broad subject. Volatile facts include an observation date or an “as of” date. Statistics should identify the metric, unit, time window, source, and important limitation when those details affect interpretation.

Original contribution

Every campaign article must add more than a summary of existing search results. That contribution may be a reproducible checklist, a worked formula, a transparent comparison method, a decision matrix, a failure-mode analysis, or a primary-source synthesis that resolves a real ambiguity.

We do not publish separate pages for minor keyword variations. One page owns one reader intent unless the desired answer, audience, or format is materially different.

How we use AI

AI may assist with discovery, outlining, transcription, comparison, drafting, and quality checks. It is not treated as a source. Claims still need a real source, and calculations, product facts, links, and quotations must be checked independently.

We do not publish hidden instructions for AI systems, crawler-only copy, fabricated citations, or large volumes of unreviewed generated text.

Financial and safety boundary

Blog articles are educational research, not individualized financial, legal, tax, or security advice. They do not tell a reader to buy, sell, hold, or size a position. Historical patterns are not forecasts.

Automated token and contract checkers identify known signals. They can miss risks and cannot certify that an asset, protocol, wallet, exchange, or smart contract is safe. Readers remain responsible for their decisions and should seek qualified professional advice when appropriate.

BlockMind's investing agent follows the same product boundary. It can research, monitor, and explain. It cannot trade, withdraw, transfer, or sign wallet transactions, and it does not make investment decisions for the user.

Comparisons and commercial content

BlockMind is a commercial product and may appear in comparisons. Comparison pages must state their scope, observation date, and methodology. Competitor capabilities and prices are sourced from current public documentation where possible. We describe which workflow may fit which reader, including cases where another product is a better fit.

We do not claim hands-on testing unless the stated tests were actually performed. We do not accept payment for rankings in BlockMind editorial content.

Dates and review cadence

• Published is the first public publication date.
• Updated changes only after a substantive edit.
• Review by is the planned evidence review date in the article record.

The BlockMind Research Team owns every organization-authored article review unless a named reviewer is added explicitly. High-volatility comparisons, pricing, product capabilities, and AI-platform behavior are reviewed within one calendar quarter. Medium-volatility workflows and security mechanics are reviewed within six months. Stable definitions, formulas, and checklists are reviewed at least annually.

A review may confirm that no visible change is needed. We do not change dates merely to make an article appear fresh.

Corrections

Send a correction request to contact@blockmind.app with the article URL, the disputed sentence, and supporting evidence.

When a correction changes a material fact or conclusion, we update the article, its modified date, and the relevant source. Small spelling or formatting fixes do not receive a new modified date. If a page no longer serves a distinct or accurate purpose, we consolidate it into the strongest relevant page and redirect the old URL.

Product facts

Pricing and connection instructions live in canonical documentation so volatile details are not copied across dozens of articles:

• Plans and pricing
• Connect your portfolio
• Trust and security
• Current limits

If an article and a canonical documentation page disagree, contact us. The inconsistency should be corrected rather than rationalized.