KOL analysis

Different analysts see the same chart differently: a macro thinker asks about Fed direction and cycle position, a technician asks whether price reclaimed the level, a risk manager asks what breaks first. KOL Analysis lets you borrow those lenses — your agent analyzes a question in a specific analyst's voice and framework, so you can stress-test an idea against a way of thinking that isn't your own.

The three modes

You don't pick a mode from a menu — you describe what you want, and your agent picks the right depth.

Q&A — one analyst, one answer

Ask a question through a single analyst's framework. Fast and focused: "How would a macro-first analyst read this market?" You get one coherent perspective, applied to your question.

Synthesis — two frameworks, one view

Have two frameworks look at the same question and merge into a single answer: where they agree, where they diverge, and what the combined read is. Useful when your idea looks great on the chart but you're unsure about the macro — or the other way around.

Discussion — full cross-critique

The deep mode: a full discussion between experts, where each framework critiques the others' reasoning rather than just answering in parallel. Positions get challenged, weak arguments get exposed, and you see why the perspectives disagree, not just that they do.

Discussion mode is genuinely heavy: it takes 5–20 minutes to run and uses noticeably more of your monthly usage than a normal question. Your agent warns you before starting one, so you won't kick it off by accident.

How to invoke it

Just ask in chat, naming the perspective you want:

• "How would a pure technical analyst read my ETH position right now?"
• "Give me a macro take and a chart take on this, and synthesize them."
• "Run a full discussion on whether this narrative has legs — I want the frameworks to argue."

KOL Analysis and Verdicts

KOL Analysis and Verdicts are related but sit in different places. Verdicts — the fourth stop in the Explore → Analyze → Verdicts → Track journey — are structured second opinions on a saved analysis, delivered by built-in experts with distinct frameworks (and any custom frameworks you've saved in your Notebook). KOL Analysis is the conversational version: the same idea of framework-based perspectives, available on any question in chat, at whatever depth you choose — no saved analysis required.

Rough guide: working through a saved idea inside the journey → Verdicts. Ad-hoc "how would X see this?" in the middle of a conversation → KOL Analysis.

Related